From the point of view of my martial art, I find weak schools. The reason for this is that these schools do not know how to win others by whatever means necessary, considering that virtue is the length of the sword, they want their swords are very long in order to defeat opponents from a distance. The common saying about winning even a centimeter is something that concerns people who do not know martial arts. Any attempt to gain advantage from a distance by the length of the sword, without know the principles of the martial arts, is something people do for weak of heart. It is for this reason I consider this martial art as weak. Sometimes when you're struggling with an opponent and have little space, the longer our sword, the harder it will hit him. You can not wield the sword back and forth with sufficient ease, and it becomes a nuisance. Then in a worse situation than someone who is driving a small side sword.

Those who prefer very long swords have their own reasons, but is only logical to themselves since ancient times has said that includes the little big, so there is a question of rejecting indiscriminately length, is a question of rejecting the deviant attitude which only takes into account the length. Hits powerful sword in the other schools should not be a distinction between strong and weak attacks hits saber. The motion of a sword made with the intention of wielding strong is rude, and it is difficult to win only with the rudeness. If golpeais the sword of another strongly, using a movement too powerful, have negative consequences for excessive force. If golpeais the sword the other, so forced, will be our own sword which will be delayed.

Thus, there is no such thing as a particularly powerful sword stroke. Even in large-scale military science, if you have a big contingent that wants to make a powerful fighting battle, the fact is that your enemy also has strong people and wants to fight hard. In this respect, both are in the same position. When it comes to getting the win in anything, is impossible to obtain without reason. The positions of the sword in the other schools is wrong to focus solely on the sword guard position. The position of the guard of the sword only when it is not adversaries. The reason for this is to set standards because of custom or general rules is not feasible in the course of a real battle for victory. The aim is to fight to put the adversary in a disadvantage. Whatever the reference point, the adoption of a guard position has the sense to make use of tenure. Save a castle or have a line of battle in a defensive position is the sense of being strong and not be affected even when attacked, this is the normal meaning. In the course of the struggle for victory through military science, the focus is on the opponent take the lead. This must be worked in depth. During the fight for victory thanks to military science, you defeat the defenses of undoing others, making moves that opponents do not wait, confused, angry or scared, and feeling the rhythm pattern when the opponents are mistaken for victory. Thus, there is a rejection of the defensiveness that is mindful of the guard positions. Therefore, in my science there is what is called having an unguarded guard position, which means that a has a defensive position without being defensive. e-mail